Keeping it real
![Engine testing at Millbrook Engine testing at Millbrook](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi8t3U_7En73wZD1N2ZglvrmKHtjXz71nSwxl-OQk2sQzZ3FlfftTCYUl7T40niIUWW98yaDCN_lL8yAjYyes6G8Kua7i9-7nRKVC6AIA1-UyY6gV8xfijiBehwSY6j38KvLfOle39J72Sb/s660/engine-testing-at-Millbrook.jpg)
Virtual reality and computer aided engineering are incredibly useful tools, but there is a limit to what can be achieved using digital simulation. Testing in the real world, both in the field and in the lab, remains a vital part of developing new cars.
For Engine Technology International I spoke to a variety of specialists about the value of physical testing and its complex and evolving relationship with simulation. Those experts were:
- Fredrik Andersson, chief programme engineer for powertrains at Volvo
- Joseph Bakaj, vice president of product development at Ford of Europe
- Dave Meek, engineering director at Intertek
- Stephen Ratley, engine test leader at Horiba Mira
- Phil Roberts, principal engineer at Horiba Mira
- Phil Stones, chief powertrain engineer at Millbrook
- Stefan Trampert, group vice president of operations at FEV Group
Key quote
“It’s rare for simulations to throw up the unexpected. It does happen – and will happen more as simulations get more complicated – but physical testing will always have the ability to surprise you”
Dave Meek, engineering director, Intertek